|
Federal
Register Notices > Notices - 2006
>
Notice of proposed year 2007 assessment of annual needs.
FR Doc E6-17526 [Federal Register: October 19, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 202)]
[Notices] [Page 61801-61803] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19oc06-128]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA-300P]
Assessment of Annual Needs for the List I Chemicals Ephedrine,
Pseudoephedrine, and Phenylpropanolamine for 2007: Proposed
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Justice.
ACTION: Notice of proposed year 2007 assessment of annual needs.
SUMMARY: This notice proposes initial year 2007 assessment of annual
needs for certain List I chemicals in accordance with the Combat Methamphetamine
Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA), enacted on March 9, 2006. The Act required DEA to
establish production quotas and import quotas for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine,
and phenylpropanolamine. This effort was done in order to prevent the illicit
use of these three chemicals in the clandestine manufacture of methamphetamine.
The enactment of the CMEA places additional regulatory controls upon the
manufacture, distribution, importation and exportation of the three List I
chemicals.
DATES: Comments or objections must be received on or before December
4, 2006.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling of comments, please reference "Docket No.
DEA-300P" on all written and electronic correspondence. Written
comments being sent via regular mail should be sent to the Deputy Assistant
Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration,
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL.
Written comments sent via express mail should be sent to DEA Headquarters,
Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL, 2401 Jefferson Davis
Highway, Alexandria, VA 22301. Comments may be directly sent to DEA
electronically by sending an electronic message to dea.diversion.policy@usdoj.gov.
DEA will accept attachments to electronic comments in Microsoft Word,
WordPerfect, Adobe PDF, or Excel file formats only. DEA will not accept any file
format other than those specifically listed here.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine A. Sannerud, PhD, Chief,
Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, Drug Enforcement Administration,
Washington, DC 20537, by e-mail, ode@dea.usdoj.gov or by fax, (202) 353-1263.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 713 of the Combat Methamphetamine
Epidemic Act of 2005 (Title VII of Pub. L. 109-177) (CMEA) amended section 306
of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) (Title 21 United States Code (U.S.C.)
Sec. 826 "Production quotas for controlled substances") by adding ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine to existing language to read as
follows: "The Attorney General shall determine the total quantity and establish
production quotas for each basic class of controlled substance in schedules I
and II and for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine to be
manufactured each calendar year to provide for the estimated medical,
scientific, research, and industrial needs of the United States, for lawful
export requirements, and for the establishment and maintenance of reserve
stocks." Further, Sec. 715 of CMEA amended 21 U.S.C. Sec. 952 "Importation of
controlled substances" by adding the same List I chemicals to the existing
language in paragraph (a), and by adding a new paragraph (d) to read as follows:
(a) Controlled substances in schedule I or II and narcotic drugs in schedule
III, IV, or V; exceptions:
It shall be unlawful to import into the customs territory of the United
States from any place outside thereof (but within the United States), or to
import into the United States from any place outside thereof, any controlled
substance in schedule I or II of subchapter I of this chapter, or any narcotic
drug in schedule III, IV, or V of subchapter I of this chapter, or ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine, except that--
(1) such amounts of crude opium, poppy straw, concentrate of poppy straw, and
coca leaves, and of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine, as the
Attorney General finds to be necessary to provide for medical, scientific, or
other legitimate purposes, and * * *
(d)(1) With respect to a registrant under section 958 who is authorized under
subsection (a)(1) to import ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine,
at any time during the year the registrant may apply for an increase in the
amount of such chemical that the registrant is authorized to import, and the
Attorney General may approve the application if the Attorney General determines
that the approval is necessary to provide for medical, scientific, or other
legitimate purposes regarding the chemical.
Note: This excerpt of the amendment is published for the convenience
of the reader. The official text is published at 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and (d)(1).
The responsibility for establishing the assessment of annual needs has been
delegated to the Administrator of the DEA by Sec. 0.100 of Title 28 of the Code
of Federal Regulations. The Administrator, in turn, has redelegated this
function to the Deputy Administrator, pursuant to the Code of Federal
Regulations Title 28 Sec. 0.104.
The proposed year 2007 assessment of annual needs represents those quantities
of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine which may be manufactured
domestically and/or imported into the United States to provide adequate supplies
of each substance for: The estimated medical, scientific, research, and
industrial needs of the United States; lawful export requirements; and the
establishment and maintenance of reserve stocks.
Calculation of the Assessment: Medical Needs of the United States for
Ephedrine and Pseudoephedrine
Since the manufacture and importation of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine have not been previously regulated through the establishment
of an assessment of annual needs, the Drug Enforcement Administration obtained
assistance from a private independent contractor,
IMS Health Government Solutions (IMS), to develop the proposed initial
estimate of the medical needs of the United States of ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine. IMS' estimates of medical needs for ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine were derived from 2005 data that the company routinely collects
and offers to customers in order to understand the pharmaceutical market. For
this analysis, IMS utilized the following types of data: (1) Sales to retail
establishments (including pharmacies), (2) sales by retail establishments to
patients, and (3) medical insurance claims. IMS' estimates of medical needs were
intended to encompass only those products containing either ephedrine or
pseudoephedrine, whether requiring a
[[Page 61802]]
prescription or available over-the-counter (OTC). Its estimates of use
encompassed those products containing ephedrine and pseudoephedrine which are
lawfully marketed under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.
Although no direct estimates for the assessment of annual needs are currently
available, IMS utilized information from a variety of data sources to develop
three independent measures (as described in the next paragraph). After each of
the three independent measures were calculated for ephedrine and pseudoephedrine,
IMS then took a weighted average of the three individual estimates in order to
derive its final estimate which was then considered by DEA. The weighted average
was determined based on IMS' confidence in each individual estimate such that
estimates with less confidence were given less weight.
The first estimate was based upon product sales to retail outlets, from IMS'
National Sales Perspective (NSP) service. This estimate was supplemented with
information from: IMS' Drug Distribution Database (DDD) and National
Prescription Audit (NPA), ACNielsen's Scantrack (ST) and Homescan (HS) services.
The second estimate was based upon product sales to customers, from NPA, ST, and
HS services, supplemented with information from DDD and NSP services. The third
estimate was based upon patient prescription claims data from IMS'
ReferencePoint (RP) database, supplemented with information from United States
Census Bureau population estimates and IMS' National Disease and Therapeutic
Index (NDTI), NSP, DDD, ST, and HS services. A copy of the IMS report may be
obtained from DEA Diversion Web site at: http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov .
Based on the IMS report, DEA concluded that 3,800 kg of ephedrine and 350,700
kg of pseudoephedrine were required to meet the medical needs of the United
States.
Calculation of the Assessment: Medical Needs of the United States for
Phenylpropanolamine
DEA did not request that IMS determine the medical needs for
phenylpropanolamine. In November 2000, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
issued a public health warning for phenylpropanolamine and requested that all
drug companies discontinue marketing products containing phenylpropanolamine due
to the drug's association with risk for hemorrhagic stroke. In response to the
FDA's warning, many companies voluntarily reformulated their products to exclude
phenylpropanolamine. Subsequently, on December 22, 2005, FDA published a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (70 FR 75988) to reclassify all over- the-counter nasal
decongestants and weight control drug products containing phenylpropanolamine
preparations from their previously proposed monograph status (Category 1) to
nonmonograph (Category II). FDA concluded that drug products containing
phenylpropanolamine cannot be generally recognized as safe and should no longer
be available for over-the-counter use in humans. Therefore, for purposes of
calculating the medical needs of the United States for phenylpropanolamine, DEA
considered the drug's use in veterinary products only.
DEA obtained from the FDA a list of all companies that manufacture veterinary
products containing phenylpropanolamine. DEA contacted each company and
requested information relating to sales of their phenylpropanolamine-containing
products. Based on this review, DEA concluded that 4,354 kg were required to
meet the medical needs of the United States.
Calculation of the Assessment: Industrial Needs, Export and Inventory
Requirements
After DEA considered the medical needs for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine and
phenylpropanolamine (veterinary products), it then considered: (1) Industrial
needs of the United States, (2) lawful export requirements, and (3) maintenance
of reserve stocks to determine the assessment of annual needs for ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine.
In consideration of the industrial needs of the United States for these three
chemicals, DEA considered the use of ephedrine for the domestic manufacture of
pseudoephedrine in 2005 and the amount of phenylpropanolamine used for the
domestic manufacture of amphetamine in 2005.
In consideration of the requirements for lawful export purposes for these
three chemicals, DEA considered total 2005 exports as provided on the DEA-Form
486 entitled "Import/Export Declaration--Precursors and Essential Chemicals."
Exports reported on the DEA-486 were as follows:
| List I chemicals |
2005 export quantity (kg) |
| Ephedrine |
2,540 |
| Pseudoephedrine |
90,260 |
| Phenylpropanolamine |
320 |
In consideration of the amounts required for the maintenance of reserve
stocks, DEA considered 20% of the estimated medical and industrial requirements.
Based on this information, the Deputy Administrator hereby proposes that the
year 2007 assessment of annual needs for the following List I chemicals,
expressed in kilograms of anhydrous base or acid, be established as follows:
| List I chemicals |
Proposed year 2007 quotas (kg) |
| Ephedrine (for sale) |
7,100 kg |
| Ephedrine (for conversion) |
128,760 kg |
| Pseudoephedine (for sale) |
511,100 kg |
| Phenylpropanolamine (for sale) |
5,545 kg |
| Phenylpropanolamine (for conversion) |
6,240 kg |
Ephedrine (for conversion) refers to the industrial use of ephedrine, i.e.,
that which will be converted to pseudoephedrine. Phenylpropanolamine (for
conversion) refers to the industrial use of phenylpropanolamine, i.e., that
which will be converted to amphetamine by the pharmaceutical industry. The "for
sale" quotas refer to the amount of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine used for purposes outside of the above-mentioned
conversions.
All interested persons are invited to submit their comments in
writing or electronically regarding this proposal following the procedures in
the ADDRESSES section of this document. A person may object to or comment on the
proposal relating to any of the above- mentioned chemicals without filing
comments or objections regarding the others. If a person believes that one or
more of these issues warrant a hearing, the individual should so state and
summarize the reasons for this belief.
In the event that comments or objections
to this proposal raise one or more issues which the Deputy Administrator finds
warrant a hearing, the Deputy Administrator shall order a public hearing by
notice in the Federal Register, summarizing the issues to be heard and setting
the time for the hearing.
The Office of Management and Budget has determined
that notices of quotas are not subject to centralized review under Executive
Order 12866.
[[Page 61803]]
This action does not preempt or modify any provision of State law; nor does
it impose enforcement responsibilities on any State; nor does it diminish the
power of any State to enforce its own laws. Accordingly, this action does not
have any federalism implications warranting the application of Executive Order
13132.
The Deputy Administrator hereby certifies that this action will have no
significant impact upon small entities whose interests must be considered under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. The establishment of quotas
for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine is mandated by law. The
quotas are necessary to provide for the estimated medical, scientific, research
and industrial needs of the United States, for export requirements and the
establishment and maintenance of reserve stocks. While quotas are of primary
importance to large manufacturers, their impact upon small entities is neither
negative nor beneficial. Accordingly, the Deputy Administrator has determined
that this action does not require a regulatory flexibility analysis.
This action
meets the applicable standards set forth in Sec. Sec. 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice Reform.
This action will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $118,000,000 or more in any one year, and will not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995. This action is not a major rule as defined by Sec. 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Congressional Review Act).
This action will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000
or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability
of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies in
domestic and export markets.
Dated: October 13, 2006.
Michele M. Leonhart, Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc.
E6-17526 Filed 10-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
NOTICE: This is an
unofficial version. An official version of these publications may be obtained
directly from the Government Printing Office (GPO).
|