|
Federal
Register Notices > Registrant
Actions - 2006 >
William G. Hamilton, Jr., M.D.; Revocation of Registration
FR Doc E6-10781 [Federal Register: July 11, 2006 (Volume 71, Number
132)] [Notices] [Page 39129-39130] From the Federal Register Online via
GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr11jy06-116]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
William G. Hamilton, Jr., M.D.; Revocation of Registration
Procedural History
On July 23, 2004, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), issued an
Order to Show Cause to William G. Hamilton, M.D. (Respondent), which
proposed to revoke his DEA Certificate of Registration AH8873588, as a
practitioner, see 21
U.S.C. 824(a)(3), and to deny any pending applications for renewal
or modification. See 21
U.S.C. 823(f). As grounds for the proceeding, the Show Cause Order
alleged that on March 3, 2004, the Medical Board of California had
suspended Respondent's state medical license and that Respondent was
without state authorization to handle controlled substances in that
state. The Show Cause Order notified Dr. Hamilton that should no request
for a hearing be filed within 30 days, his hearing right would be deemed
waived.
On July 28, 2004, the Show Cause Order was sent by certified mail to
Respondent at his home address in San Diego, California. However, the
letter went unclaimed. On November 23, 2004, the Show Cause Order was
sent via regular mail to Respondent at the same address, and on December
13, 2004, a DEA Diversion Investigator personally served him with the
Order. At the time of personal service, Respondent acknowledged that he
had received the Show Cause Order that was mailed to him on November 23,
2004. Subsequently, DEA has not received a request for a hearing or any
other reply from Respondent or anyone purporting to represent him in
this matter.
Therefore, finding that: (1) Thirty days have passed since the
delivery of the Order To Show Cause to Respondent; and that (2) no
request for a hearing has been received, I conclude that Respondent has
waived his hearing right. See James E. Thomas, M.D., 70 FR 3,564 (2005);
Steven A. Barnes, M.D., 69 FR 51,474 (2004); David W. Linder, 67 FR
12,579 (2002). After considering material from the investigative file in
this matter, this final order is entered without a hearing pursuant to 21
CFR 1301.43(d) & (e), and Sec.
1301.46.
Discussion
I find that Respondent is currently registered with DEA as a
practitioner authorized to handle controlled substances in Schedules III
through V under Certificate of Registration AH8873588, with an
expiration date of October 31, 2005. Respondent's registration, however,
has remained in effect during these proceedings.
According to information in the investigative file, on March 3, 2004,
a California State Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) issued an Order, which
immediately suspended Respondent's Physician and Surgeon's Certificate.
The suspension was based, in part, on the ALJ's finding that Respondent
was unable to safely practice medicine due to a mental or physical
condition. Since then, I have become aware of further proceedings
involving Respondent's state medical license.
It has long been recognized that "[a]gencies may take official notice
of facts at any stage in a proceeding--even in the final decision.''
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Attorney General's Manual on the Administrative
Procedure Act 80 (1947) (Wm. W. Gaunt & Sons, Inc., Reprint 1979).
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 556(e) and 21
CFR 1316.59(e), I hereby take official notice of the fact that on
May 12, 2005, the State of California revoked Respondent's medical
license.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act and
DEA's regulations, Respondent is "entitled on timely request, to an
opportunity to show to the contrary.'' 5 U.S.C. 556(e). See also 21
CFR 1316.59(e). DEA's regulations contain no provision for requesting
reconsideration of a final order. See Robert A. Leslie, M.D., 60 FR
14004, 14005 (1995). To allow Respondent the opportunity to refute the
facts of which I am taking official notice, publication of this final
order shall be withheld for a fifteen-day period, which shall begin on
the date of service by placing this order in the mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Respondent has submitted no evidence showing that the State's
revocation order has been stayed or vacated. Therefore, I find that
Respondent is currently not authorized to practice medicine in the State
of California, and that he is also without authorization to handle
controlled substances in that state.
DEA does not have statutory authority under the Controlled Substances
Act to issue or maintain a registration if the applicant or registrant
is without state authority to handle controlled substances in the State
in which he practices medicine. See 21
U.S.C. 802(21), 823(f),
& 824(a)(3).
This prerequisite has been consistently
[[Page 39130]]
applied. See Richard J. Clement, M.D., 68 FR 12,103 (2003); Dominick
A. Ricci, M.D., 58 FR 51,104 (1993); Bobby Watts, M.D., 53 FR 11,919
(1988). Therefore, Respondent is not entitled to maintain his DEA
registration.
Order
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority vested in me by 21 U.S.C. 823
and 824 and 28 CFR 0.100(b) and 0.104, I hereby order that DEA
Certificate of Registration, AH8873588, issued to William G. Hamilton,
Jr., M.D., be, and it hereby is, revoked. I further order that any
pending applications for renewal or modification of the aforementioned
registration be, and they hereby are, denied. This order is effective
August 10, 2006.
Dated: June 12, 2006.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6-10781 Filed 7-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
NOTICE: This is an
unofficial version. An official version of these publications may be obtained
directly from the Government Printing Office (GPO).
|